 | Attendere prego... |
Schede casuali
|
To live or not to live?
 Foto Cosa voglio o desidero dagli altri? Bavarian Dialect Decoded: Learn to Understand Bavarian Dialect politica Riva al mare drop down menu Parameters Description To add a description you must put it in the link title separated with 2 bars Title of the link||Description Loading a module Loading by ID, you must add this in the link title [modid=IDOFMODULE] Multicolumns To set a new column and give it a width, you must add this in its title [col=180] where 180 is the width in px of the column Images management To display only image in a link (without text), you must put this in the title [img] Grazia  Sebastião Salgado Photographs 28 come mi piacerebbe essere ricordato dopo la mia morte Samah Karaki, Docteure en Neurosciences - Apprendre à maîtriser son cerveau berlin.de/en considera cosa vogliono e offrono e cosa tu vuoi e offri rispetto a loro Music database - Radio Swiss Jazz  20121014195819-54.jpg) Brassaï (Gyula Halász) 53 Man for himself stricken to knit La mia saggezza poter immaginare qualunque cosa Una poetessa persone Misanthropy Una persona cinese persone Denaro sufficiente Dear Mom and Dad: I Cured My Depression, But You Might Not Like How I Did It  Gustav Klimt 7 Scegliere Sacerdote  Irving Penn 44 Homaranismo (Wikipedia) Which types of friendships are you targeting? In their book on friendship, Liz Spencer and Ray Pahl identified 8 different types (based on their research). Associates were people who only shared a common activity, like a hobby or a sport. Useful contacts were people who shared information and advice, typically related to work or advancing ones career. Favor friends were people who helped each other out in a functional manner, but not in an emotional manner. Fun friends were people who socialized together, but only for fun. They didn’t provide each other with a deep level of emotional support. Helpmates were a combination of favor friends and fun friends. They socialized together and helped each other out in a functional manner. Comforters were like helpmates, but they also provided emotional support. Confidants disclosed personal information to each other, enjoyed each other’s company, but weren’t always in a position to offer practical help, for example if they lived far away. Soulmates displayed all of the elements. Which types of friendships are you targeting?
Selected comments
Paul, thank you. However, I think this classification of friends is a little bit uncompleted as well as your consideration of this problem in your slide-show. For example, what about relatives, coworkers, online friends moved from offline, etc. I research this issue a couple of years and write on “virtual friendship” in context of “social” Internet future at my blog (unfortunately, in Russian only). Last my post on this topic is “Social labyrinth, or What is a friend’s weight?” http://amilner.itechbridge.com/2010/07/20/social-labyrinth/ . It’s regarding your last posts and your future book. You could understand what I want to say if read attachment in English to the post.
Paul, thanks for sharing; we need many more conversations like this! My hypothesis is that digital social networks give us unprecedented choice of people with whom to have relationships, but very few humans have EVER been good at choosing and managing complex relationship webs (“social networks”). Why? Because geo and social position largely dictated with whom we interacted. IOW, we aren’t supposed to be good at this. As an exec and long-time networker and coach, i have remarked on this but only recently it because obvious (after reading Dunbar). People aren’t good at offline networking, and online is even more difficult for them because they aren’t aware of how to do it face to face, so transferring to a digital process is even harder. Cheers
[...] Eight types of friendship » THINK OUTSIDE IN Fun friends were people who socialized together, but only for fun. They didn’t provide each other with a deep level of emotional support. Helpmates were a combination of favor friends and fun friends. They socialized together and helped each other out in a functional manner. Favor friends were people who helped each other out in a functional manner, but not in an emotional manner. Comforters were like helpmates, but they also provided emotional support. [...]
My thoughts on Different type of Friends | Mentyzee's Blog October 12, 2012 at 10:55 am [...] Hi readers, ( i really wanna know who actually read my blog posts), i am just curious ya know .hehehe it is 4:30 am , where maybe some people just woke up and getting ready to work or maybe there are people at the other side of the planet is working? taking nap? or more… and i am supposed to be on my bed and sleep tightly and cover myself with my warmiee winnie the pooh blanket … i tried to force myself to sleep since 2:30, i lied on my bed and played my tablets till 3:30 am .. and i still don’t feel tired at all. i have been thinking a lot. really a lot .or somehow my mind is wandering around and i could not focus at all … at some point, i am thinking about my parents, my future, my future husband, people around me, random faces and moreeee.. i was just over-thinking. think too much and sometimes is not necessary at all ..i should just stay focus on myself. what i should do and who i want to be …(is it sound selfish) okay, so what do i really want to talk about? okay look, i wanna talk about soul mates, real friends and real buddy so i went to google and typed “different type of friends” so the first webpage shown me this http://www.thinkoutsidein.com/blog/2010/04/eight-types-of-friendship/ [...]
Wisdom Wednesday | Pathway to Spiritual Rebirth […] Associates were people who only shared a common activity, like a hobby or a sport. Useful contacts were people who shared information and advice, typically related to work or advancing ones career.Favor friends were people who helped each other out in a functional manner, but not in an emotional manner. Fun friends were people who socialized together, but only for fun. They didn’t provide each other with a deep level of emotional support. Helpmates were a combination of favor friends and fun friends. They socialized together and helped each other out in a functional manner. Comforters were like helpmates, but they also provided emotional support. Confidants disclosed personal information to each other, enjoyed each other’s company, but weren’t always in a position to offer practical help, for example if they lived far away. Soulmates displayed all of the elements.http://www.thinkoutsidein.com/blog/2010/04/eight-types-of-friendship/ […]
© 2014. Think Outside In. Powered by WordPress. Cleanr theme by WPShoppe
 Foto1 List of Free Screen Capturing Tools Wikipedia Italiano shoppydoo.it Google groups - psicologia flessibili  Ella Fitzgerald Filmsforaction.org/walloffilms Photography - Fotografia la mia libertà Rivedere/correggere i miei siti web  20121014195818-39.jpg) Brassaï (Gyula Halász) 39 assemblea ISTJ (about.com) politico la reputazione altrui Distruggere Doppio vincolo 2 x 6 12 Google Cloud overview le mie conoscenze accademiche  Sofia Vergara Messa a Vienna Insegnare francese Milano, 2013 Infidelity Rule #2: The human brain evolved (we have three brains)
Mi sta succedendo qualcosa di pericoloso? Posizione gerarchica giustificata la madre mother Rigetti pro-bellezza facebook.com/esperienza.psicologica mi fai paura Massimo Gravellini Famous Introverts (video) intuition Di cosa accuso gli altri? paura di essere diverso roba Repel or not repel? riusciti Video tutorial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDe7rmYgObI  Oliviero Toscani Photographs 35 My favorite things - the song (various interpretations) i miei esercizi di autoterapia hebephilia  Michel Petrucciani Commento di Gregory Bateson su Korzybski La mappa non è il territorio e il nome non è la cosa designata Questo principio, reso famoso da Alfred Korzybski, opera a molti livelli. Esso ci ricorda in termini generici che quando pensiamo alle noci di cocco o ai porci, nel cervello non vi sono né noci di cocco né porci. Ma in termini più astratti la proposizione di Korzybski asserisce che sempre quando c'è pensiero o percezione oppure comunicazione sulla percezione vi è una trasformazione, una codificazione, tra la cosa comunicata, la Ding an sich, e la sua comunicazione. Soprattutto, la relazione tra la comunicazione e la misteriosa cosa comunicata tende ad avere la natura di una classificazione, di un'assegnazione della cosa a una classe. Dare un nome è sempre un classificare e tracciare una mappa è essenzialmente lo stesso che dare un nome. Tutto sommato, Korzybski parlava da filosofo e cercava di convincere gli altri a disciplinare il loro modo di pensare. Ma era una battaglia perduta in partenza. Quando passiamo ad applicare la sua massima alla storia naturale dei processi mentali umani, la cosa non è più così semplice. Forse la distinzione tra il nome e la cosa designata, o tra la mappa e il territorio, è tracciata in realtà solo dall’emisfero dominante del cervello. L'emisfero simbolico o affettivo, di solito quello destro, è probabilmente incapace di distinguere il nome dalla cosa designata: certo esso non si occupa di questo genere di distinzioni. Accade quindi che certi tipi di comportamento non razionale siano necessariamente presenti nella vita dell'uomo. È un fatto che noi abbiamo due emisferi, e da questo fatto non possiamo prescindere. È un fatto che questi due emisferi operino in modo un po' diverso l'uno dall'altro e non passiamo sfuggire alle complicazioni che questa differenza comporta. Con l'emisfero dominante possiamo considerare, ad esempio, una bandiera come una sorta di nome del paese o dell’organizzazione che essa rappresenta. Ma l'emisfero destro non fa questa distinzione e considera la bandiera sacramentalmente identica a ciò che essa rappresenta. Così «Old Glory» è gli Stati Uniti: se qualcuno la calpesta, può esserci una reazione di rabbia. E questa rabbia non la si diminuisce spiegando le relazioni tra mappa e territorio. (Dopo tutto chi calpesta la bandiera la identifica a sua volta con ciò che essa rappresenta). Ci saranno sempre e necessariamente moltissime situazioni in cui la reazione non è guidata dalla distinzione logica tra il nome e la cosa designata. vedo film e opere teatrali di nuovo genere  Casa Scienze vicini New limit imposed on max. number of addresses per message? Hello, Gmail used to have a limit of 500 recipients per email message (or 100 if sent from an email client program). I send weekly emails to a list of about 50 addresses. All was fine, until this week. This week's message bounced saying that the message was "blocked" to every single address, including my own. I received 50+ bounces, one per address. After a few days of retrying, and looking for an explanation, I finally resorted to sending separate emails to everyone on the list, and they all went through, no problem. Golly. But I got lazy near the end of the list, and my last message was addressed to 11 recipients -- and that one bounced. When I split it into two messages with half as many recipients each, they both went through. Therefore, I conclude that someone at Google has throttled the threshold down from 500 to about 10. When the limit is exceeded, the bounce message is cryptic, saying little more than the fact that the message has been "blocked", and refers to https://support.google.com/ For example:
followed by a severely truncated version of my email message, and no further diagnostic information. In case it matters, messages were sent from Gmail's web interface (client software not involved), on Chrome. What's going on? Has there been an announcement about such a change? Does it sound like a bug? Thanks, Andy
-----------------------
Hi Andy,
That has been happening to me as well. It started a several months ago, but I would split my list to 40 recipients and all would be fine. Then after a few days, no problem I can send out to my email group of 125 with no problem until it happens again. Recently, some messages are blocked and others aren't. Some group messages retry delivery over a period of time which results in multiple blocked replies for each recipient. At first I thought it was because of the graphics in my message, but even that is not consistently blocked.
I find if I send to small group of 2 or 3, it's fine. But that is too much of a hassle.
Once I received a link that suggested I create a google group. But that is not what I want to do. My group emails are notifications and I want to keep it as such.
And I don't want to subscribe to an email client.
Yes, it appears the messages are blocked internally by google.
Andy, I'm glad you've posted as I want to understand what is going on, too.
inkling sentore, vaga conoscenza, vago sospetto Law of the excluded middle For any proposition, either that proposition is true, or its negation is. crescere allievo What does X expect / not expect from me? Psicologie i miei muscoli paura La filosofia contro se stessa. Albert Camus, o un filosofo fuori dalla filosofia i miei musei preferiti avere un orgasmo le mie foto  Mothertheresa p salita My Favorite Things| Al Jarreau William MacAskill (Wikipedia) |
Org
English version 
